Antichrist–a Person or a spirit of evil behind political power?

Dr. Vishal Mangalwadi, India’s leading Christian scholar, stated on May 2, 2011 (as reported at http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-scholar-america-could-produce-antichrist-of-the-21st-century-50078/),

“The antichrist is an invention of American eschatology,” said the India-born scholar who now resides in California. “I’m using the word antichrist exactly as the New Testament uses it, which is different than the way American eschatology uses it, which is the Antichrist.”

Notice Dr. Vishal Mangalwadi believes that the United States could produce the next Antichrist, just as Germany produced Hitler. Dr. Mangalwadi has not done his Bible study homework. There is no possible way that Antichrist could come from the United States of America. The Bible does tell us where Antichrist will come from, but apparently most Bible-reading, Bible believing Christians are unaware of this bit of information to be found in the Bible. Some of the most significant clues are furnished by a passage in Daniel (Daniel 11:40) and Micah (Micah 5:5).

The term “antichrist” appears in the following New Testament passages:

1Jn 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

1Jn 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

1Jn 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

2Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

The “spirit of antichrist,” the Apostle John wrote, was already in the world even at the time he wrote 1 John 4:3.

John equates the antichrist spirit with those individuals or movements that deny the fundamental Christian doctrine that Jesus Christ has come “in the flesh.”

No false cult or false religion will assert straightforwardly that Jesus Christ was God in human form. This doctrine in theology is the doctrine of the Incarnation.

This doctrine is denied by Kenneth Hagin and Kenneth Copeland in their writings. These men are or were leaders in the Charismatic Movement. They believe and assert that Jesus was God before he took on human form, and was God once again when he returned to heaven some forty days after the resurrection, but Jesus was not God in human form from the time of his birth in Bethlehem to the time of his death on the Cross.

Hagin and Copeland misunderstand Philippians 2:7 (Young’s Literal Translation),

Php 2:7 but did empty himself, the form of a servant having taken, in the likeness of men having been made,

for they believe as a man Jesus emptied himself of all the attributes of Deity. This involves what is called “The Kenosis Theory” in theology. Many in the Word of Faith church or movement have been taught this heresy. Others likewise fall into this error.

But the Bible is very clear when it states at Hebrews 13:8,

Heb 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.

Jesus Christ, the Messiah, has never changed in his Person, and has never given up any of his divine attributes, including the attribute of immutability or changelessness asserted of him in Hebrews 13:8.

My point is that it is apostasy and heresy, a departure from the faith, to deny that Jesus Christ is God manifest in the flesh. Such denial is the spirit of antichrist.

But a careful reading even of these few texts which directly use the term antichrist would show to every reader that antichrist is referred to as a person when John states “ye have heard that antichrist shall come” (1 John 2:18).

Beyond this solid evidence related directly to the term “antichrist” is the large body of evidence throughout the Bible which discusses this person under many different names and titles. Ignoring or denying this evidence in the Bible won’t make it go away.

Every careful Bible reader who engages in Real Bible Study surely knows that the Antichrist is a person who, as of this writing, is yet to appear.

If you agree with Dr. Vishal Mangalwadi and therefore disagree with me, let’s talk about it here!

Posted in Bible Prophecy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 46 Comments

Will Islam dominate the world?

Protest signs at a ‘funeral’ in England for Osama bin Laden claim “Islam will dominate the world” (See http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/245148/ of Friday, May 6, 2011).

A careful study of Bible prophecy would surely indicate otherwise, at least in the “long run.” There is some good evidence that Islam will not be in existence at all by the time Ezekiel 38 and 39 come to pass, since the Islamic nations that surround Israel mentioned in Psalm 83 seem to be left out of the list of nations mentioned in the confederation of nations lined up against Israel mentioned in those chapters. This may be because they have been defeated prior to Ezekiel 38 and 39 events. It is not absolutely certain that Psalm 83 is prophecy, but my study so far indicates it is, because nations and events are mentioned which are not a part of the historic events that form the basis for the Psalm. See the cross references given in Nelson’s Cross Reference Guide to the Bible at Psalm 83:8, and consult the cross references at the passages listed there for Assur. Careful study of the cross references will produce unexpected enlightenment on this prophetic theme.

The taunt or threat recorded or predicted in Psalm 83:4 sounds strikingly familiar:

Psa 83:4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.

World or national leaders who make threats like that surely have little or no knowledge of the Bible.

According to one of the provisions in the Abrahamic Covenant, such threats are exceedingly dangerous to the one or ones making the threat:

Gen 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

The proper attitude to have is found stated in this passage of Scripture:

Psalm 122:6 Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.

Considering the remarkable accuracy of Biblical prophecy, it is a very poor choice to stand on the wrong side of what God declares He will do.

I’m still studying these topics, and my conclusions are not final. But so far, this is the way I see the Biblical evidence pointing, as far as I have studied it.

It is almost certain that the Antichrist does not come from Europe. The Antichrist is certainly not the Pope. Antichrist appears to arise in the Middle East from the Biblical region named Assyria, according to Micah 5:5.

In two weeks we will find out if Harold Camping is correct in his understanding of Bible prophecy. I am absolutely certain he is mistaken, for his understanding of Bible prophecy is flawed by his dependence upon mistaken notions pertaining to Bible chronology and the meaning of numbers in the Bible.

Furthermore, what he proposes could not be learned from a study of a plain text Bible on Robinson Crusoe’s deserted island. From what I heard of Mr. Camping’s claims in an interview aired yesterday with Bob Dutko on WRDT Detroit 560 AM of the Crawford Broadcasting Network, Mr. Camping’s understanding of Bible prophecy may be tainted from his prior attachment to Reformed and Calvinistic theology. Those who adhere to the Reformed position on Bible prophecy, like the respected Bible teacher Dr. R. C. Sproul, are absolutely wrong on the subject.

I am not equating Dr. Sproul with Mr. Camping. Dr. Sproul is a reliable teacher, except for his commitment to the mistaken theology of Calvin. Calvin is mistaken because he leaned too heavily upon the writings of Augustine, a Roman Catholic church father. Whenever we derive our theology and understanding of the Bible from an extra-biblical source, especially from an “ism,” such as Calvinism, or any other “ism,” such as Seventh Day Adventism (extremely mistaken on Bible prophecy and the Sabbath Commandment), or Arianism (an ancient heresy now promoted by the Jehovah’s Witnesses in their denial of the Deity of Jesus Christ), we will be utterly mistaken about what the Bible really teaches.

That is why it is most important to engage in Real Bible Study as discussed and taught here!

Posted in Bible Prophecy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 31 Comments

National Day of Prayer

Today, Thursday, May 5, 2011, is the National Day of Prayer.

It is so by official proclamation of the President of the United States of America.

That is a good thing.

Every Bible reader should support the National Day of Prayer.

Prayer is a major subject in the Bible. One of the important methods of Bible study is Topical Study. There are several ways to do a topical Bible study. There are study Bibles designed to make the study of Bible topics easier. One such study Bible which I highly recommend is The Thompson Chain Reference Bible. If you don’t have this resource, I suggest that you get it.

There are several ways to “get into” the resources of the Thompson Chain Reference Bible. One way is to go to a verse that contains the subject you want to study further, and look for the topic number given in the margin of the Thompson Chain Reference Bible. You may from there move forward and backward in the Bible verse by verse by turning to the Scripture reference that was previous or is next in the “chain,” given with the topic number in the margin.

If you don’t recall a specific verse about the topic you wish to study, you may consult a Bible concordance and search for the word pertaining to the subject to find a verse. You may also consult the index to all the chain references found immediately after the last book in the Bible, the book of Revelation. The index is very thorough, and it will lead to the topic number for the subject of your interest. Turn to that number in the Text Cyclopedia which immediately follows the index. In the case of the subject Prayer, you will find 21 numbered categories for this subject, beginning with “(1) Gen. Ref.. to, 2816.” You will find Topic 2816 starts at the bottom of page 108, which has the verses presented in full text format under a helpful outline with five subtopics.

To expand your findings beyond what is given in The Thompson Chain Reference Bible for any topic or subtopic, simply consult the same Scripture passages, using Nelson’s Cross Reference Guide to the Bible for those verses.

If you are fortunate enough to own a printed copy of The New Treasury of Scripture Knowledge, you can find far more on the subject of prayer in the Bible than you will find in any other resource by consulting the Subject Index, the Topic Number Index, and the very extensive Prayer Index.

The software version of The New Treasury of Scripture Knowledge is still available, the printed book is not. Unfortunately, the software version does not contain the Topic Number Index, which index contains important entries for the subject of prayer not found elsewhere in the indexes.

I learned from an email message from Jay Sekulow today that there is an atheist group, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), which objects to the National Day of Prayer. Mr. Sekulow has written about that in a post on BeliefNet which is most informative.

I find it very strange that atheists and agnostics refuse to have any discussions with me here at Real Bible Study. The invitation is still open.

Apparently, atheists and agnostics are not willing to be challenged in return by someone who has answers to their questions.

I hope they will attempt to prove me wrong about their recalcitrance. They are certainly welcome to do so here.

In the meantime, surely those of us who believe the Bible support the National Day of Prayer, the phrase “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, and the First Amendment to the Constitution, the whole Bill of Rights, and the Constitution as well.

It is clear to me that the Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, by his exercise of unlawful prior restraint of the right to Freedom of Speech and the Free Exercise of Religion guaranteed by the First Amendment, is in grave and I hope what will prove to be very expensive error for him and his fine city.

The Dearborn Mayor and the Dearborn Police Department have absolutely no right and no business in restricting the rights of Christians to share their faith with others vocally or in printed form on the public streets and areas of the City of Dearborn, Michigan.

On Good Friday, Pastor Terry Jones was prevented from exercising his free speech rights by being tied up in court most of the day. During the Arab Festival the Christian missionary group, I think it is called “Acts 17” was prevented from exercising their free speech and freedom of religion rights under the First Amendment by authorities in Dearborn, Michigan.

The Mayor seems to be supporting the followers of Islam but restricting the rights of Christians. I mean no offense against Islam or their Holy Book, the Koran, but it is obvious that Islam is a false religion, because it asserts truth claims contrary to what is taught in the Bible. Since the Bible has been proven true beyond any reasonable question or doubt, that proves, by the rule in logic called “the law of non-contradiction,” that Islam must be false. Islam claims God cannot have a Son. The Bible, New Testament (John 3:16) and Old Testament (Psalms 2:12. Proverbs 30:4) clearly teaches otherwise. The New Testament claims our Lord Jesus Christ died on the Cross, and rose bodily from the dead. Followers of Islam mistakenly claim otherwise.

In this country you have a right to be wrong. Those who choose to follow Islam have the right to practice their religion here. Unfortunately, their failure to grant equal rights to freedom of religion in their countries (Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia) shows they are unwilling to practice reciprocity. This, of course, is a direct violation of Scripture.

I find it a real problem when the Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, and those who support him, are unwilling to permit absolute freedom of practice of the Christian religion, especially the faith of Bible believing Christians, who desire to be in obedience to the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to share the Good News of the Gospel with every creature (Matthew 28:19. Acts 1:8).

On this Day of Prayer, and every day, we need to be in earnest prayer for our civic and political leaders (1 Timothy 2:1-4). We need to pray for the conversion of all followers of Islam to the true Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ (2 Peter 3:9).

If followers of Islam happen to disagree, I firmly recommend they return to their own country of origin, and leave the rest of us here free to practice our faith without prior restraint, and without so-called “free speech zones,” like those apparently in force in Dearborn, Michigan.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bible Study Tools

What is the most important tool in your Bible study toolbox?

The Bible study tool I find most useful is studiously avoided by almost every advocate of Bible study.

I say that because it is almost never mentioned.

I cannot imagine why.

It may be because many authors and teachers don’t know about my favorite Bible study tool themselves. It may be that they have never used it enough in Real Bible Study themselves, so it has not become their own favorite.

I have read many of the writings of Dr. Wilbur M. Smith. He wrote a very helpful, even fascinating book titled Profitable Bible Study. My hardbound copy is from 1953, a revision of the original publication in 1939. The subtitle states “Seven Simple Methods—with an Annotated List of the First One Hundred Best Books for the Bible Student’s Library.”

This volume by Dr. Wilbur Smith mentions the “fascinating little book, What Can Literature Do for Me?” on page 25. I was able to secure a used copy of that work, and have made its chapters into lesson plans for teaching literature to my English classes.

Literature can do commendable things in our lives, but the Bible can do far more.

I once had a student in my remedial reading class who was not interested in reading anything unless it was Bible-related. I typed up special reading selections just for her benefit. She especially liked what I shared about how to study Bible people. She wrote many reports about the characters in the Bible using the study outline I provided her.

I don’t suppose very many English teachers would have been prepared to meet the needs of a student like her. I’m thankful the Lord placed her in my class so she could have a teacher willing to adjust the course material for her study in a way that would meet her interests.

We need to study the Bible, and learn the Bible, and live the Bible.

But back to the writings of Dr. Wilbur Smith: though he shows great familiarity with the value of good cross references, mentioning those given in the Nestle Greek New Testament, and even those in The New Testament with Fuller References, he never once mentions The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge, which has the greatest collection of cross references of all.

I have been privileged to expand and correct the cross references in The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge in my first work, The New Treasury of Scripture Knowledge. The New Treasury is no longer available in printed book form from the publisher. It is available in Logos and Libronix Bible study software.

My second work is available only in printed book form, Nelson’s Cross Reference Guide to the Bible.

The New Treasury and the Cross Reference Guide are the most important tools in my Bible Study Toolbox.

Any person who has any interest whatever in the Bible will certainly find that this extensive collection of cross references will, upon repeated use, become his or her own most important Bible study tool too.

Posted in Bible Study Tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Real Bible Study Applies to Real Life, Part 2

Real Bible Study Applies to Real Life Part 2

Turmoil continues on the political and educational scene.

I heard mention on the news this morning that Detroit will be required to close half its schools, and that class sizes will grow to 60 students at the high school level.

Protests are being mounted in Michigan’s capital city, Lansing, with the Tea Party Movement, Republicans, and on the other side, the teachers out in full force.

Among my emails this morning is one from “RightMarch.com PAC, Patriotism in Action,” asking me to support Wisconsin Governor Walker’s budget cutting proposals.

Objections are raised to the state collecting teacher union dues.

That is nonsense. Republicans and misinformed Tea Party activists may peddle slick propaganda, but they hardly know how to tell the truth. And, in terms of what the Bible teaches, that is INJUSTICE in the extreme.

Like taxes, teacher union dues are collected by means of payroll deduction.

What the right-wing faction is after is to dismantle the Teachers’ Union. This faction wants to institute conditions equivalent to what is called a “Right to Work” state. And that amounts directly to a “Lack of due process state” where employers can extend working hours without additional remuneration to the teachers or other workers, a direct violation of the commands in the Bible (Luke 10:7. Jeremiah 22:13).

And the reasoning behind that (dismantling the Teachers’ Union, gutting the Teachers’ Contract)?

They want administrators to be able to fire a teacher on a whim. Administrators are too lazy and inept (I fully documented that in Part 1) to follow due process procedures. Administrators claim it is too hard and too costly to treat teachers fairly and properly. They want to be able to fire them outright. And they would if they could.

Why do the Tea Party and Republican protestors want union dues to be voluntary? Because this would decimate the strength of the union. In plain English, Republicans and Tea Party protestors are engaged in blatant union-busting.

Furthermore, why should some teachers get the benefits of hard-won contract improvements without having to pay union dues? They want to be free-loaders, which is clearly unjust to those teachers who are footing the bill.

My father told me many years ago, “The only reason you need unions is because of bad management.”

We currently have bad management in the schools because we have inept and immoral and incompetent administrators, as I documented thoroughly in Part 1.

He was absolutely right.

I see no evidence in all this commotion to put forth a movement to evaluate and improve administrators. They must be sacrosanct.

And they are growing in numbers.

And administrators are very highly paid.

When I began to teach at Denby High School in Detroit in 1990 the school had two administrators: the Principal and one Assistant Principal. When I was a student in Detroit at Cass Technical High School, a school of 5000 students, there was only one Principal and one Assistant Principal. That is the way it should be.

But by the time I retired from teaching at Denby High School, the administrative staff had grown to seven Assistant Principals. And Denby High School has just over 2000 students.

Many school systems are administratively top-heavy. That seems to reflect the fact that administrators of today are less competent than those who preceded them, so more of them are required, and they still don’t know how to get the job done!

In the sources I cited in Part 1, statements were made about how teachers are overpaid. The salary figure most prominently featured was $100,000 a year.

I think this morning’s email was more honest: it reports for Wisconsin:
• Average teacher salary: $48,000

But then the absurd statement is given:
• Normalized for a 12 month work year: $64,400

Of course, never a word about the fact that teachers work nine months a year, indeed, but the time they get off is an UNPAID INVOLUNTARY LAYOFF, so attempting to foist the notion of “normalized for a 12 month work year” is nonsense and unjust.

It seems everyone who has ever gone to school deems themselves experts about the schools.

If you are able to read this with understanding, be thankful to God that He privileged you to have teachers somewhere along the line who successfully taught you how to read.

Most people in America do not know how to read. Only one-third of college graduates know how to read adequately according to research I read published just last year.

Most Bible believing Christians who read and study their Bibles, especially if they make use of the King James Version, have taught themselves to read at a higher grade level of reading comprehension than most students otherwise achieve by the time they graduate from high school.

I read an article by Diane Ravitch, an excellent opinion piece, about what is really behind the protests in Wisconsin being mounted against the teachers. In the public comments below, a poster asserted that while it is good to encourage students to read non-fiction at home, reading the Bible is counterproductive because people who read the Bible demonstrate such ignorance about everything else.

As an experienced reading specialist I can assure you that most of the students who came from Bible reading homes demonstrated better behavior and better reading skills than most other students who came from families that did not share this background. I observed this repeatedly and regularly in the students in my own classroom for more than thirty years.

INJUSTICE IS AT THE HEART OF THIS WHOLE PROBLEM.

Why are states like Wisconsin and Michigan and Ohio and Tennessee and probably everywhere else facing such problems and pressures?

The problems are financial.

The problems reflect the higher unemployment rate because of this Second Depression.

Unemployed people can no longer afford to stay in their expensive homes. They cannot keep up the mortgage payments and fall behind.

Property values fall, and reduce property tax revenue.

In many states, it is the property taxes that support the schools.

But the real estate market is a continuing fiasco.

AND THAT IS THE HEART OF THE INJUSTICE PROBLEM.

Banks and Mortgage Companies with the assistance of relaxed standards of accounting and law made mortgage loans to people without verifying whether those people were in a position to make good on repaying the mortgage.

They bundled these mortgages into very risky investment vehicles and sold them to unwary investors, including not only individual investors but even some pension funds.

Banks themselves were allowed to engage in very risky investments after the bankers’ lobbyists recently persuaded Congress to get rid of the Glass-Steagal Act, passed at the tail end of the Great Depression to prevent banks from engaging in such practices ever again.

Now we see the outcome and unwisdom of these decisions.

Banks, especially some very large ones, tottering on the verge of insolvency, strong-armed Congress again, threatening that the looming disaster would result in tanks in the streets, demanding they be bailed out as “TOO BIG TO FAIL.”

It is the greed of the financial community that has directly brought on our present economic meltdown.

The banks, especially the Federal Reserve, have DIRECTLY VIOLATED BLACK LETTER LAW WITH IMPUNITY, and it is they who are to blame for the problems states are now facing.

Our Federal Judges and the Courts have largely refused to address these problems, though there are some very significant lawsuits making their way through both state and federal courts that may bring redress for a few.

But so far, not a single banker has been placed in handcuffs or in jail for violating the law.

IT IS THE CONTINUED FLAGRANT REFUSAL TO ENFORCE PRESENT LAWS THAT LETS THIS SECOND DEPRESSION CONTINUE.

Bankers have flagrantly flaunted the rule of law because they know what the Bible teaches:

WHERE THERE IS NO PENALTY, THERE IS NO LAW.”

AND THAT IS ABSOLUTE INJUSTICE.

The Bible declares that when God hears the cry of the poor, He responds.

Those who are responsible for the injustice had better look out!

To learn more, do some Real Bible Study for a change. Get your Bible out. Get hold of Nelson’s Cross Reference Guide to the Bible and dig into the references supplied on this subject, starting at Exodus 3:7-8. Be sure to follow the “+” symbol which indicates “Find more here,” as at Exodus +22:23-24.

I furnished my three administrators at Southeastern High School a printout of many of those cross references. I knew they were each active in their own church, and though they might not take the time to look up the references, perhaps they would read them if I printed them all out for them.

As the school union representative, I was charged with oversight of enforcement and compliance with the teacher contract. But as a Christian, I knew that the most important contract is the contract God has carefully spelled out in the Bible. If you break His contract, you are in very serious trouble. Just check out the cross references at Genesis 6:13 which demonstrate God promises to deal with injustice here and now as well as hereafter, and Malachi 3:5, which spells out the provisions of God’s teacher contract, for He is “against those that oppress the hireling in his wages.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 59 Comments

Real Bible Study Applies to Real Life

Real Bible Study applies to real life.

The doctrine of justice in the Bible applies to contemporary events, even though the Bible was written long ago.

For example, in Wisconsin, the Governor and the Republican legislature are bent upon removing the collective bargaining rights of the state’s teachers, not to mention other public employees, even—from the reports I’ve heard—nurses.

I recently read where the State of Tennessee is planning to take away rights of teachers in a similar fashion.

It is happening in Michigan, too. In an article titled “The West Bloomfield Teacher ‘Sick Out,'” published on line at www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/14584, dateline February 18, 2011, an article written by Tom Gantert, mentions:

• Contract negotiations between the administration and unions began in October 2009. The teachers’ union contract expired August 31, 2010.
• Superintendent JoAnn Andrees said that West Bloomfield teachers do not do any premium sharing for health insurance and do not have a deductible in their plan. “The district can no longer afford to pay for everything,” Andrees said. “The money is not there now. I can not continue that practice.”

The facts brought against teachers in the rest of the article only sound worse in following paragraphs.

Below the article are links under “See also:” to other anti-teacher articles, including an issue Republicans always attack, “Don’t Tenure Current Teacher Tenure Law.”

Noting the sponsor of the “Michigan Capitol Confidential” website tells it all: “A news service for the people of Michigan from the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.”

There is much adverse commentary—adverse to teachers, that is—in the comments submitted below the article.

Now, I believe in the First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, and Freedom of Religion, as much or perhaps somewhat more than those reported on, reporting, or commenting on the Internet page I have cited. So they are welcome to express their opinions, even if such opinions are uninformed.

But I have also been a teacher in the inner city high schools of Detroit, Michigan, from 1962 until I retired in 2001.

One of the first things I encountered as a teacher in Detroit was the grossly unfair procedures used by the school administration to “rate” teachers. My brother was unfairly rated unsatisfactory. I still have the documentation. New teachers need to be affirmed, assisted, and given time to grow and develop in their teaching ability, content knowledge, and classroom management skills. That is not what happened.

Furthermore, my brother was rated unsatisfactory in his teaching position at Northern High School and later at a middle school for matters that were not his fault whatsoever.

For example, at Northern, he was asked to teach classes with no textbooks, and no supplies. Since I had recently left my employment at Michigan Bell Telephone Company, I had “inside knowledge” which I shared with my brother on how to get the telephone company to donate used, discarded tools for his students to use in studying electrical. Some administrators were highly upset that my brother took the step to solve his problem by securing these tools which the school would not supply. The administrators said that what he did embarrassed them. They rated my brother unsatisfactory.

My brother abruptly was transferred to a middle school, where the situation was worse. He was to teach his classes in an unfinished shop. The shop was still under construction. He notified his administrators of the unsafe conditions. The very next day a student was injured when he playfully “chinned” himself by hanging onto a vise handle on his way into the classroom. That tipped the steel workbench over on himself, with such force that it broke the vice mounting bolts off. My brother was immediately rated unsatisfactory.

He was rated unsatisfactory again because his bulletin board was not up-to-date. That is nonsense. My brother received two full mailbags of materials from electrical companies, and used the latest publications as teaching materials which were placed on the classroom bulletin boards for student information and learning. I wrote a very strong objection to the bosses of the supervisor, suggesting that not only was the rating unfair, it was absurd. I questioned the qualifications of the supervisor as a bulletin board expert.

Over several years I wrote a number of constructive suggestions to the school central administration about how to properly follow due process and how to properly assist new teachers, instead of discouraging them. Once I was shown the Principals’ Handbook, and its contents clearly mirrored my constructive suggestions, so someone must have read my letters, though they never let me know.

My brother had spent hard-earned money, both his, and my parents, to obtain a college education to qualify for his teaching position. But he had to give up his dream of teaching. He was never in a position financially to go back to college to qualify for a different career. He should never have had to face such a difficulty. Because of unusual circumstances beyond his control and inept administrators and supervisors and department heads, he lost his teaching position. He has been under-employed ever since.

This anecdotal experience is not merely anecdotal, it reflects a serious plague in our educational system. The plague affecting our system is INJUSTICE.

As an experienced union representative for my high schools where I taught, I was able to encourage the teachers’ union to fight for binding arbitration for teachers so that the rights they have won in their contract could be enforced. Until then, an arbitrator could rule in favor of a teacher, but the administration took it as merely an advisory opinion which did not have to be followed. The union followed my suggestion, and teachers won the right to binding arbitration.

But here in Michigan, Governor Engler, a Republican, undid all the years of struggle I engaged in to secure both binding arbitration and other teacher contract rights by passing and signing in the middle of the night while the union president was out of the country Public Act 112, which removed the rights of teachers to collective bargaining in important areas of the contract, especially the area of teacher evaluation. This is a most striking example of INJUSTICE.

Apparently, people today are as uninformed as they always have been. They jump at the opportunity to attack teachers and unions. They are eager to undermine the livelihood of teachers. They claim teachers are paid too well. They argue teachers only work part time, so why get paid so much? They argue teachers have health coverage superior to their own. They argue teachers have exorbitant pension plans. They argue most teachers lack the necessary education to teach their subjects.

I taught English. I’ve mentioned elsewhere on this site that I took enough semester hours (93) to equal a triple academic major in English. I specialized in writing, linguistics, and grammar. College is expensive. I figured I could learn about literature on my own by doing my own reading.

When my very first classes had many students who were far below grade level in their reading comprehension, I wrote my own program to close what is now called their “achievement gap.” You can read all about that at my other website, www.readingsteps.com, where I furnish the history and document the statistics that demonstrate my reading program works.

By the time I retired, though students still needed the help my reading program provides, I could no longer use it because I was required to follow the mandatory “Pacing Chart,” which the administration insisted was our “new Bible.” The “Pacing Chart” mandated exactly what was to be taught each day from the textbook. Never mind that the students could not actually read the textbook with understanding!

Of course, some administrators haven’t learned yet that not every student is ready to learn exactly the same thing at exactly the same time. This is especially true when the students arrive underprepared for high school work. Many students in inner city high schools are actually reading on a grade level from three to eight or nine years below their grade level. According to the standardized reading tests I administered to my own students, it was a rare senior student who read as well as eighth grade reading comprehension. Most read at fourth grade level.

How administrators suppose such students can read British literature for their twelfth grade course I can’t imagine.

Critics suppose that teachers should be evaluated on how well the students they teach do on “performance tests” (which at the state level are a joke) or standardized tests (somewhat better). What they don’t take into consideration is that teachers cannot be held responsible for the students’ level of achievement upon entry into their classes.

Teachers who are favorites of the administration may be given the better classes. Teachers less favored might have all “failure classes.”

Rating teachers on the basis of student improvement in achievement may be the height of injustice.

And those exorbitant teacher pensions? I had to buy mine. Money went out of my bi-weekly paycheck from the start of my teaching career until I retired. I had to shell out an additional four percent of my pay to qualify for one additional benefit with my pension. Most of the complainers could not live on what I receive, I’m sure. And they would not dial down their thermostat in winter to 56 degrees and turn the hot water on only one day a week to save on the oil bill like I have done.

Most of the complainers did not have to pay for six years of college or more out of their own pocket and start at a very low starting salary once they qualified for the job.

Most complainers don’t have to pay thousands of dollars, or even hundreds of dollars a year, to pay for supplies and materials their employer should provide. As a teacher, I did. I ended up writing my own materials to teach my students, because the school board and the local school did not furnish what was needed.

At my own expense I typed up materials for the course, assembled them into sheet protectors, and housed them in plastic Sterling Letter File boxes (I still have them all). I bought the highest quality sheet protectors available so the materials would stand up to student wear and tear and frequent abuse.

When I began teaching at Southeastern High School (in the news this past week because one eleventh grade student was shot while protesting against cuts in the fine arts department program) I was furnished a small cardboard box of textbooks to teach my history courses, world and American history. There were only a few books in the box. They were not even all the same title. It took me several years of scrounging textbooks during locker cleanup at the end of subsequent school years before I even had enough books to form one classroom set. And I had to guard those with care or they would “walk off.” Other teachers and students needed them too.

Now do you wonder why Detroit has a 70% high school dropout rate? That reflects injustice.

But in my classes, it was very rare for a student to drop out of school. Two classes I taught were “looped,” such that I taught the same students for all four years of high school. Only one student from those two groups dropped out over the span of four years.

Generally speaking, my students loved my class, and were most appreciative of the help I gave them in all of their classes.

Even my students complained of what they saw as an injustice when, over my many years of teaching, never once was I named “Teacher of the Year.”

What does all this have to do with Real Bible Study? The following verse by itself should make it clear:

Luk 10:7 And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

John 6:44 Cross Reference Study Part 3

John 6:44 Bible Text (King James Version):

John 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:44 Cross References

except. FS184C, Mt +4:9. ver. 45, 65. Jn *3:3-7. *10:26. Mt 11:25-27. *16:17. 2 C *4:6. Ep *2:4-10. Ph *1:29. Col *2:12, 13. T 3:3-5. Ja *1:18.

Cross References for John 6:44 Part Three in full text format:

Joh 6:45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.

Joh 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Joh 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
Joh 3:4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?
Joh 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
Joh 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
Joh 3:7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

Joh 10:26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.

Mat 11:25 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.
Mat 11:26 Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight.
Mat 11:27 All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.

Mat 16:17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

2Co 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

Eph 2:4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,
Eph 2:5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)
Eph 2:6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
Eph 2:7 That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

Php 1:29 For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake;

Col 2:12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.
Col 2:13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

Tit 3:3 For we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another.
Tit 3:4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,
Tit 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

Jas 1:18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.

Posted in Verse-by-Verse Studies | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

What you DON’T know CAN hurt you!

Many well-meaning church-goers are very content to be spoon-fed spiritually by hearing the Sunday school lesson or the Pastor’s message once a week for an hour.

Increasingly, many people do not go to church. People in churches, particularly pastors, think this is a violation of Hebrews 10:25, where the Bible commands us not to forsake the assembling of ourselves together. What most pastors and other Christian leaders have apparently no clue about is the fact that many people who would gladly go to church do not do so because they have been pushed out, in violation of Romans 15:7.

But whether you go to church or not, you still need spiritual food for yourself which you can only get from personal, independent Bible study.

What if you fed your physical body just one hour a week? Surely your physical health would deteriorate rapidly! And you would feel very ill very soon.

The same holds true for your spiritual health, only somehow we don’t seem to feel this as sharply as we would physical hunger.

Are you hungry spiritually? If not, then there is good reason to believe you might be spiritually dead.

Now if you were physically dead, you probably would not be reading all this. It would likely then do you little good.

But no matter what your actual spiritual state may be just now during this life, you can benefit from an improved spiritual diet.

Start with the basic spiritual food first. You will find that in the Gospel of John in your Bible, the fourth book in the New Testament.

Read the Gospel of John through repeatedly. Try reading at least three chapters a day for one week, and do this for a whole month. After reading it through four times in a row you should begin to understand and appreciate more of what it says.

Move on to the book of First John near the end of the New Testament, and read it repeatedly in the same way until you begin to master its contents.

You can easily do your own deeper study of the book of First John. There are certain words that are used repeatedly in the book, such as “light,” “life,” and especially the word “know.” Study the book of 1 John until you know what the book says you can know!

What you don’t know can hurt you, indeed. You need to get your knowledge of the Bible and spiritual things from the right source. That right source is the Bible itself.

I have described Real Bible Study here before as a wonderful trip to visit Robinson Crusoe’s Deserted Island for a time of uninterrupted study of the Bible alone.

God Himself in His wonderful Book clearly states in Proverbs 8:9 that the Bible is understandable. The Bible teaches this same truth in many other places. I’ve called attention to some of those places in some of my other posts on this site. I hope you will take the time to read the older posts on this site, reading them from the oldest to the newest in that order. You will learn a lot by doing this.

There is a grave danger in running to denominational commentaries, for if they are wrong, and they almost always are, you have no “checks and balances” within their source material to absolutely verify that they are teaching the truth. The Bible itself is the truth, and it is a self-teaching, self-correcting Book, if you will read it for yourself and let the Bible teach you.

There are many mistaken ideas taught in churches and by churches and denominations, ideas that cannot be found in the Bible if you were to read and study the Bible itself without the denominational “helps.”

That is why I suggest studying the Bible by using only a plain text Bible first.

Besides studying individual books of the Bible in depth, starting with the New Testament books of John and First John, do straightforward reading of the New Testament by reading it in sequence from beginning to end. Spend at least twenty minutes a day without fail doing this reading. Most days you ought to be able to find even more time for reading.

Once you have done this kind of independent Bible reading and Bible study, reading individual books repeatedly, and the New Testament continuously, you will begin to notice many subjects and themes are mentioned in more than one place. You will be able to see “connections” between things you never noticed before.

When I first began my Bible reading, I marked these themes using a short abbreviation for each theme which I penciled in the margin of my pocket New Testament. Sometimes I would stop and review those marked passages by theme, such as reading in turn all those marked ‘Pr’ for prayer, or ‘F’ for faith, and so forth. This helped cement the message of the New Testament on these themes in my mind. I suggest you try this practice too as a method of independent Bible study you can easily do yourself.

Now, there are much deeper subjects worthy of our personal, independent study in the Bible. Some of these subjects can be quite controversial, and you will find that many fairly well-informed individuals who appear to know their Bible well are not in agreement on just what the Bible teaches about these.

Some people shun these subjects, perhaps figuring “What I don’t know won’t hurt me,” when the real truth is that what you don’t know not only can but will hurt you spiritually.

We are commanded in the Bible to be ready to give an answer to anyone who may ask us the basis we have for the hope that is within us (broadly paraphrasing 1 Peter 3:15). To do this, we need to have a firm and thorough grasp of what we believe, and why. This requires a continuing growth in our knowledge of the Bible on our part. Such knowledge must not remain the province of our church or pastor or Sunday school teacher. We must learn these things for ourselves if we are to be adequately protected from falling prey to “every wind of doctrine” (Ephesians 4:14) and if we are to become firmly grounded in our faith (Colossians 1:23).

I shared the following Proverb with all my classes in public school for all the years I taught school as the very first of the daily proverbs and quotations I posted on the classroom blackboard: “Wisdom is the principal thing, therefore get wisdom; with all thy getting, get understanding” (Proverbs 4:7). I believe that wisdom and understanding comes primarily from the Bible.

Another quotation I shared far less often said something like “He who learns by finding out knows seven-fold more than he who learned by being told.”

That is why I believe you need to study the Bible daily for yourself!

Posted in How to Study the Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Agnostics & Atheists with questions welcome here!

I encourage any agnostics or atheists with questions about the Bible or Christianity to post a comment here.

I accept and allow to post any comment that pertains to the subject matter of my post.

I would encourage any who post to consider writing their own comments rather than copying information from other sources, although brief, or relatively brief, quotations for discussion are appropriate.

That keeps the discussions directly on target, and keeps post length to something everyone can comfortably read.

Currently on another site a most interesting discussion has raised the question about whether or not God is a personal God. Questions also arise concerning the Bible–can we believe it? Is it literally true? Is the Bible inerrant?

A very thorny issue raises the question about does God communicate personally with man, or any individual person, now?

When we need God’s guidance, it would really be nice if He would condescend to writing a personal letter to us, sending it by what used to be called “Registered Mail.” I know the Post Office could use the extra first-class mail business!

But it seems God has kept a strange and virtually absolute silence for nearly 2000 years. Now, the “Silence of God” is a very deep subject of study when it comes to Real Bible Study, so I don’t recommend starting there. Sir Robert Anderson wrote a book on the subject titled The Silence of God which I recently downloaded onto my “nook” electronic book reader and I’ve now read it twice. Robert Anderson has written more on the subject than I’ve seen elsewhere, but even after reading his book twice through late last year I see a need for even more direct study of what the Bible itself actually teaches about it.

I am developing a new and much expanded cross reference Bible study tool for eventual publication in electronic/computer software format. I just finished my basic work on the book of Psalms earlier this evening. I’ve spent the past six months going through the 150 chapters of the book of Psalms twice. I spent one whole month just on Psalm 119, the longest chapter in the Bible, adding more cross references tied to more keywords in the Bible. My file grew from ten pages to just over 26 pages in length.

I am convinced that the Bible really is true. One thing the Bible has going for it that the religious books of other faiths do not is historicity. This FACT is why I believe the Bible is much more worthy of belief than any other religious text.

For example, the New Testament records are proven historically accurate down to very minute details. The New Testament contains written eye-witness testimony to the facts of which it speaks. The New Testament bears testimony to the bodily resurrection of Christ with greater detail and the record of more eyewitnesses than any other important incident of ancient history.

New Testament manuscripts are numerous, and the earliest manuscript fragments go back to a time only 40 or so years after the death of the last New Testament writer, John. No other ancient literature of Greece or Rome has anywhere near the amount of manuscript evidence, or manuscripts dating so close to the time of writing as the New Testament does.

So don’t be misled by those who would argue against the New Testament on the basis that all we have is “copies of copies of copies.” The FACT is that the oldest copies we have agree extremely closely with the later manuscript copies we have, testifying to the care and accuracy with which copies were made.

I have studied this subject carefully since the mid to late 1950s, probably longer than anyone who might happen upon this blog and read this post. Scholar friends of mine gave me much assistance by providing copies of rare works on this subject, such that I have a good number of feet of shelf space in my own library devoted to these matters.

As for how do we know which books belong in the New Testament, the answer is the books that belong are all included there now. These 27 books are each written by either an apostle of Jesus Christ or by a person very closely associated with those who were. Older writers, such as Townsend in his Analysis, believed that the canon of the New Testament was established by the Apostle John, the last living apostle, before he died. I like that idea. But whether precisely true or not, the historical evidence is that copies of each book were made and shared widely among the Christian congregations or churches, and copies were made and shared with individuals as well. The Christian community, under the providential guidance of the Holy Spirit no doubt, carefully copied, distributed, and providentially preserved the books of the New Testament.

No church or denomination or council decided which books belonged in the New Testament. They only affirmed what was already accepted by Christians at large.

Some have argued that certain books were purposely “left out.” After hearing a program on the radio affirming such foolishness, I said to my wife and her mother who lives with us, let me show you once and for all how such claims are utter nonsense.

I then retrieved a book of these “Lost Books of the Bible” and the “Apocryphal New Testament” and began reading their content aloud.

My point was instantly clear.

If you are familiar with the books that are in the New Testament, and were you to read any of these other books supposedly left out, you too would immediately sense the difference. They are worlds apart.

Well, I’ve rambled on at some length.

Any one is invited to respond with a comment, pro or con or indifferent, on these or related themes.

Lets have a discussion and shed some light, not generate heat, on these very important issues.

Posted in Apologetics Issues--Agnosticism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 23 Comments

John 6:44 Cross Reference Study Part 2

John 6:44 Bible Text (King James Version):

Joh 6:44 No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.

John 6:44 Cross References

can come. ver. 35. Jn %5:40. Jb 14:4. Je *13:23. Ro 11:35, 36. 1 C **2:14. *4:7. 2 C 3:5.

Cross References for John 6:44 Part Two in full text format:

John 6:35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

John 5:40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.

Job 14:4 Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one.

Jeremiah 13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.

Romans 11:35 Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
Romans 11:36 For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.

1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

1 Corinthians 4:7 For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?

2 Corinthians 3:5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God;

Posted in Verse-by-Verse Studies | Tagged , , | 3 Comments