The Reliability of Scripture

The Nugget:

Isa 40:8  The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.

My Comment:

The evidence is clear:  the Bible is reliable. Its contents are settled. Our generally available English translations are quite accurate, though my scholar friend Dr. Malcolm Lavender has provided for us an even more accurate translation of the New Testament which is rigorously true to the grammar of the Greek text. There is no question about how many books belong in the Bible.

Nevertheless, claims are made by false religions and  false cults which seek to re-write the provisions of the Abrahamic Covenant to include themselves and exclude the Jewish people (as is done by some Muslim apologists), or which seek to add additional books to the Bible (as is done by Roman Catholic authorities, Anglicans, and no doubt others) called the Old Testament Apocrypha.

The False Claims:

Nayem Khan posted this comment on the “Christianity and Islam Friendly Debate” site on February 1, 2018:

“On My Previous Post I Posted About The Hate Jews had Toward that they even Changed the Scripture.”

My Answer:

The Hebrew text of the Old Testament and the Greek text of the New Testament have not been changed to any significant degree. This can be seen by comparing the very oldest manuscripts with newer manuscripts. What variations there are are very minor. Such changes are recorded in more scholarly resources both in print and in digital formats.

Modern study Bibles will answer the questions you raise regarding the account of Ishmael and Hagar in their accompanying footnotes.

The issues raised above are the result of misreading and misunderstanding the text of the Bible.

The Scriptures have not been changed. Anyone who believes that the Bible has been changed needs to provide academically credible documentation from scholarly sources which document facts.

A Muslim Reply:

ابو فاطمة firstly, the christiandom can’t agree which one is the real bible. i have christian friends who said this “one” is the real bible don’t read that “one”. secondly, the number of books comprising the bible is debatable, some say it’s 66 some say this number, some say this. thirdly laws considered divine in the torah were changed by paul in the new testament. fourthly, jesus did not speak greek and we can’t deny that a lot is lost in translations. fifthly, the practices (ways of worship) of christians during the time of jesus are totally different from what we see today. now if they can change something like this, how easy would it be to change the story of hajar and ismael.

My Answer:

All of your points are either mistaken or misguided. Just because some churches and denominations are mistaken about what books belong in the Bible does not mean we do not know what books belong in the Bible. There is no disagreement about the fact that the New Testament contains 27 books, the books we now have. As for the Old Testament, the 39 books of the Hebrew canon recognized in Israel are the correct books. The additional books included by the Septuagint translators are of historical value and also religious value but they are not divinely inspired Scripture.

The laws of the Old Testament were not changed by Paul. Paul was authorized by Jesus Christ Himself in person (Acts 9:15), for it is Jesus Christ who commissioned Paul to be a missionary to the Gentiles. Paul received further direct revelation from Jesus Christ regarding the content of the Gospel message Paul was commissioned to teach and preach. Furthermore, Paul was fully recognized and acknowledged by the original apostles of Jesus Christ and was given the right hand of fellowship by them. Paul’s false accusers are the ones guilty of claiming that Paul changed the law of Moses. All these things are most clear to anyone who has carefully read the record preserved in the New Testament. Jesus Christ came to fulfill the law not destroy the law. What Jesus said in Mark 7:19 shows that it was Jesus, not Paul, who set the precedent regarding which parts of the Law of Moses were now fulfilled and so set aside. The laws of Moses still apply to the Jews but do not apply to Christians, and did not apply to the Gentile converts under the ministry of Paul as was authoritatively settled by the verdict of the council reported in Acts 15, as against the Judaizers who mistakenly attempted to require obedience to the Law of Moses as a requirement for salvation.

It is most certain that Jesus Christ did speak Greek on occasion, for the figures of speech present in the Greek text of the New Testament could not have arisen in the process of translation from Aramaic, as thoroughly discussed by the great Greek scholar and grammatical authority Nigel Turner, in his work titled “Grammatical Insights,” page 181, and volume 4 of his book, “Grammar of New Testament Greek,” page 38.

The variety of the forms of worship among different groups of Christians are no argument against the truth, the historicity, the validity, and the accuracy of the New Testament. Religious groups are not divinely inspired. Denominations are not divinely inspired. The Bible is divinely inspired. We test the truth claims of individuals, groups, churches, denominations by comparing them to what the Bible itself teaches.

It is the Moslems, thousands of years after the fact, that are attempting to change the story of Hagar and Ishmael as it is given in the Hebrew Bible. The Bible is very clear that in answer to Abraham’s intercessory prayer, God established a separate Covenant with or for Ishmael, and that this Covenant is not to be confused with or joined to the original Covenant God made with Abraham and Sarah. Isaac is the son of promise and the heir of the Abrahamic Covenant as is evident by all that the rest of the Bible has to say on the subject. No one has authority to come along at a later day to change the oath-sworn Covenant given by God Himself to Abraham.

 

Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Apologetics--Christian, Bible Historicity and Validity, False Religions | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is the New Testament Holy Scripture or Not?

The Nugget:

2Ti 3:15  And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 

2Ti 3:16  All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 

2Ti 3:17  That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 

 

My Comment:

There is much widespread misinformation and misunderstanding about the New Testament and the Bible as a whole. I have written the following material on Facebook to answer some very good questions posed by those who do not believe the Bible.

The Challenge:

Jerome Smith, can you tell me how you regard the New Testament? For example, is it 100% the inspired words of God? In other words, is it holy or not?

My Answer:

The New Testament, all 27 books, all 260 chapters, is the divinely inspired word of God.

This is what the New Testament itself teaches.

The New Testament has been found to be reliable in its historical references. The researches and studies and articles and books of Sir William Ramsey confirm this in detail.

Sir William Paley wrote an unanswerable defense of the authenticity of the New Testament titled Horae Paulinae. He shows that there are many undesigned coincidences between the events described in the book of Acts and things mentioned in Paul’s letters that prove the authenticity of both.

I have demonstrated by means of cross references the absolute unity of the New Testament in its doctrine or teaching.

Most of all, the New Testament authenticates itself to the careful and sincere reader by bringing each such reader to a personal knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ and to an assurance of salvation based on the promises of our Lord Jesus Christ.

This is what Jesus said:

John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

 

 

The Muslim reply:

You hardly convince me with such things for many reasons. For example:

(1) Until the fourth century the NT was 21 or 22 books only. It was later in one of the councils they decided to ADD extra books such as Hebrews and Revelation.

(2) You have, for example, Codex Sinaiticus manuscripts which is most complete scriptures contains 29 books in NT plus some fragments.

(3) Around 50% of the NT books are from unknown authors and even unknown number of authors and when or where they were written is also unknown.

(4) Paul’s letters contain personal messages like sending greetings and asking his friend to bring his jacket that he forgot, etc. Doesn’t look like inspiration from God.

(5) Inspired words of God should be HOLY which means no errors, no contradictions, which is not the case. There are contradictions between the four gospels, between Paul’s words and James’ words, etc.

For me, each of those points are a disaster by itself and there is no excuse that can justify those problems.

My Answer:

Sherif Abdel Bary, your objections have no weight with me because I have studied these issues thoroughly and I believe I am better informed about them than you may be.
 
(1) The number of books in the New Testament has been 27 books from the beginning. See the note in the appendix in volume 2 of Townsend’s Analysis about this issue. There are many other more modern scholarly sources besides Townsend. The Church Councils did not decide the Canon of the New Testament. They only affirmed it. Hebrews and Revelation were already well received since apostolic times.
 
(2) Codex Sinaiticus does indeed include additional books, the genuine epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas, as I recall without looking up the information. These were well-regarded devotional and spiritual writings but were not fully received as canonical Scripture. This does not change the correct number of books to be included in the New Testament. No one today of scholarly stature is suggesting that we add any other books to the authentic original 27 primary source documents we call the New Testament.
 
(3) It is nonsensical to suggest the New Testament contains books written by unknown authors. The only book with any serious question as to its authorship today is the book of Hebrews. No one doubts its authenticity or its divine inspiration.
 
People who make such claims about the supposed anonymity of the authors of the New Testament books simply demonstrate their unacquaintance with the relevant historical and cultural facts involved.
 
It is not possible to foist upon all Christians a claim to the authorship or anonymity of a work regarded by them as Holy Scripture the name of a supposed apostolic witness such as Mark, Matthew, Luke, or John if the name assigned to the document has always been the writer attributed to that document. If someone were to come along at a later date and decide arbitrarily to give the name “Matthew” to the opening Gospel record of the New Testament, those alive at the time such an imposture were attempted would know that the document had not been so identified with Matthew if that had been the case in their own time. And so for the other Gospel accounts in the New Testament. This answers the relevant historical issues.
 
The cultural facts connected with the writers of the New Testament Gospels concerns their reticence to name themselves in the document. Internal evidence within the document itself identifies who the author was. That internal evidence includes the grammar, vocabulary, and style of the writer. It also includes incidental mentions of facts that required or is evidence of the writer being an eye-witness to the events the writer recorded.
 
I have seen claims of a number of individuals who state that since Matthew was a tax collector he was illiterate and could not have written the book ascribed to him. Since when are tax collectors illiterate? The claim is false on its face.
 
We have a body of literature written by Christian authors immediately after the completion of the New Testament. These authors cite the New Testament books exactly as we have them today. They attribute the quotations they make to the authors we regard as the authors of those documents even today. There is no record of any disputation among these early Christian writers about who were the original authors of the New Testament books they quote.
 
(4) The fact that Paul’s letters contain incidental reference to a number of personal requests and mentions of incidental items does not detract from their validity but proves their authenticity. See William Paley’s work titled Horae Paulinae for the full and unanswerable proof of this.
 
(5) There are no contradictions to be found within the pages of the New Testament. Some people find “contradictions” where they really do not exist because they are not as informed about the Bible as they should be. Most supposed “contradictions” are the result of misreading the text of Scripture. When anyone tries to interpret the Bible without carefully following the rules of interpretation they may well find contradictions, but their findings are not valid.

[I wrote the following comment about alleged contradictions in the Bible on another thread of discussion in another forum:]

The Bible, of course, is not full of contradictions. As it is the very word of God, divinely inspired Scripture, it is without error, though some manuscript copies may contain scribal errors which can usually be corrected from other manuscripts not containing the scribal mistake.

Some apparent errors are seen as such by those who are not reading the text and its context carefully enough.

Some bring their preconceived notions of what ought to be so and when they find those notions not supported by the Bible, they blame the Bible and claim there is a contradiction when there is none.

Many people misread the Bible one way or another or violate the rules of interpretation when they try to explain it.

 
Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Apologetics--Christian, Bible Historicity and Validity | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Daily Bible Nugget #474, John 8:24

The Nugget:

Joh 8:24  I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins. (KJV)

Joh 8:24 Therefore, I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins. (LITV, Literal Translation of the Holy Bible, an e-Sword Bible resource)

 

My Comment:

Someone on Facebook raised the valuable question:

“Can anyone show me where the Bible says Jesus is God the Son?”

This question is an example of the “exact word fallacy,” where a questioner raises a question demanding an answer in the “exact words” the question specifies. Moslems employ this fallacy frequently. So do Jehovah’s Witnesses. There may be others who fall into this logical trap. Nevertheless, here is my answer:

My Response:

There are some things in the Bible that must be understood by necessary inference.
 
Jesus said:
 
Joh 8:23  And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. 
 
Jesus also said:
 
Joh 17:5  And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. 
 
Jesus further said:
 
Joh 8:24  Therefore, I said to you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins.
 
From these passages, we can by necessary inference conclude:
 
(1) Jesus Christ had an existence with the Father from all eternity past;
 
(2) “I AM” does not merely mean “I exist.” “I AM” is a divine title which Jesus claimed for Himself. That is a title that belongs to God Himself. Therefore, as the Jewish audience correctly concluded in context, Jesus Christ was claiming to be God.
 
(3) Jesus Christ declared that if anyone does not believe in His deity (that He is the I AM of Scripture), that person will die in their sin. In other words, that person cannot be saved and does not have everlasting life.
 
From Scripture, therefore, we know that (1) Jesus is God; (2) Jesus is the Son of God; and (3) it is therefore by necessary inference proper to call Jesus God the Son.

Posted in Daily Bible Nuggets, Doctrinal Discussions, How to Study the Bible | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Daily Bible Nugget #473, Acts 3:13

The Nugget:

Act 3:13  The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let him go. (KJV)

Act 3:13 `The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, did glorify His child Jesus, whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate, he having given judgment to release him , (YLT, Young’s Literal Translation)

Act 3:13 The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified his servant Jesus, whom you delivered over and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release him. (ESV)

My Comment:

Notice that some modern English versions of Acts 3:13 render the underlying Greek word for “servant” differently than the King James Version, which translates that word “Son.” In this case, the modern English translations are actually more accurately translating the underlying Greek text.

One Muslim used this as well as other examples of translation difference to suggest that the Bible has been corrupted over time in its translation, so that what we now have cannot be trusted or regarded as the Word of God. This attitude on the part of Muslims and others is not correct. The underlying text in the original language has remained the same. Our modern understanding of the ancient Greek language is sometimes more adequate than the understanding of the King James version translators of 1611, a good while ago. That is no fault of the Bible. We are blessed to live in a time when we can more accurately access God’s Word as written in the Bible than ever before.

The Muslim challenge and my Response:

Jerome Smith Abdul Wasiu Abdul Fatah, in a comment I read some distance above in this valuable discussion, you said in part:

“Let me tell the more they edited the bible the more the change the word of god therein let me give one scenario if you can think deeply this is where you also need to realise that bible is in a great manifest errors and god is not the author of confusion in

In KJV act 3:13 this 13 KJV:The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his #Son Jesus;

This same verse in NIV says 13 NIV:The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his #servant Jesus”

Just a little checking regarding your claim in this instance involving Acts 3:13 as an example of supposed “corruption” of the Bible, I found this explanation in the Jamison, Fawcett, and Brown commentary:

“hath glorified his Son Jesus — rather, “his Servant Jesus,” as the same word is rendered in Mat 12:18, but in that high sense in which Isaiah applies it always to Messiah (Isa 42:1; Isa 49:6; Isa 52:13; Isa 53:11). When “Son” is intended a different word is used.”

Verifying the correctness of the commentary, I find that the underlying word in the Greek text is given this definition in the standard Strong’s Concordance Lexicon:

G3816
pa???
pais
paheece
Perhaps from G3817; a boy (as often beaten with impunity), or (by analogy) a girl, and (generally) a child; specifically a slave or servant (especially a minister to a king; and by eminence to God): – child, maid (-en), (man) servant, son, young man.
Total KJV occurrences: 24
Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries

This difference in translation is hardly to be considered a corruption.

Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Daily Bible Nuggets, Doctrinal Discussions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The one book you need to understand the Deity of Christ biblically

Customer Review

 

 

 on January 30, 2018

 

Robert Bowman’s work, Putting Jesus in His Place: The Case for the Deity of Christ is outstanding because (1) the authors provide an acronym which makes remembering the outline of the book and the evidence it provides much easier; (2) the main text gives the argument in a very readable manner but places much additional scholarly information in endnotes for those who wish or need to dig deeper; (3) the authors have provided far more reference to specific Scripture evidence than I have found in any other work on this subject.

This book, which I just finished reading, is without question one of the best, most helpful resources available on this subject. The importance of the subject and the clarity of presentation combine to make this one of the most significant books I have ever read. All who wish to understand the Bible better and who are serious about knowing Jesus Christ more fully will benefit from this book.

Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Apologetics--Christian, Doctrinal Discussions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Daily Bible Nugget #472, Deuteronomy 18:18

The Nugget:

Deu 18:18  I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 

My Comment:

Who is the promised Prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18?

Note that whoever that Prophet is must be “a Prophet from among their brethren.” Therefore, the promised Prophet MUST be from Israel, and therefore MUST be a Jew.

This certainly rules out Muhammed as any possible fulfillment of this Bible prophecy.

The Bible indicates that our Lord Jesus Christ is “that Prophet” that should enter into this world. This can be easily discovered by searching out the related cross references. I will share these references in full below.

I have been having a considerable discussion of these matters with a Muslim, Carlos Bettencourt Serrao, who has posted many comments lately on the Real Bible Study Facebook page. That discussion does not appear here, so I will share just a part of it now:

The Muslim Challenge:

but lets not stop there ~ john the baptist in prison sends his deciples saying seek the man jesus and ask him “are you the one or do we seek another” jesus said “i pray the father that he send you “another” helper the comforter the spirit of truth “one like moses him who david calls lord” and thy shalt abide in him for ever”

nah here [hear] moses “there shall come one like ME “a warlord” from out your brotherin him you will hear? jesus they did not hear nor welcome him in the beginning but crucified him in the end? even jesus denies himself to be the messiah ~ hear nice ~ jesus the son of david ~asks the messiah whos son is he? so the diciples answerd “the son of david” ~jesus the son of david ~ replies “if the messiah were the son of david why does david call him lord and not son?” lord is ref to kingship a warlord like moses a warlord like david in “the lord said to my lord sit here till i make you enermies your foot stool” again this is not ref to jesus for jesus enermies percicuted him and nail him to the cross remember?

My Response:

Mohammed is NOT the Prophet promised in Deuteronomy 18:18. Our Lord Jesus Christ IS the Prophet promised in Deuteronomy 18:18 according to the Bible itself.
 
Matthew 21:10-11
10  And when he was come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, Who is this?
11  And the multitude said, This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee.
King James Version
 
Luke 7:16
16  And there came a fear on all: and they glorified God, saying, That a great prophet is risen up among us; and, That God hath visited his people.
King James Version
 
Luke 13:33
33  Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day following: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem.
King James Version
 
 
John 1:19
19  And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?
King James Version
John 1:21
21  And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.
King James Version
 
John 1:45
45  Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.
King James Version
 
 
John 4:19
19  The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet.
King James Version
 
John 4:25
25  The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.
King James Version
 
John 6:14
14  Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did, said, This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world.
King James Version
 
John 9:17
17  They say unto the blind man again, What sayest thou of him, that he hath opened thine eyes? He said, He is a prophet.
King James Version
 
 
Luke 24:19
19  And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people:
King James Version
 
Act 3:19  Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; 
Act 3:20  And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: 
Act 3:21  Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. 
Act 3:22  For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. 
Act 3:23  And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. 
Act 3:24  Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days. 
Act 3:25  Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. 
Act 3:26  Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.
 
NOTE ESPECIALLY THIS QUESTION FROM JOHN THE BAPTIST:
 
 Mat 11:1  And it came to pass, when Jesus had made an end of commanding his twelve disciples, he departed thence to teach and to preach in their cities. 
Mat 11:2  Now when John had heard in the prison the works of Christ, he sent two of his disciples, 
Mat 11:3  And said unto him, Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another? 
 
THEN NOTE THE ANSWER JESUS GAVE:
 
Mat 11:4  Jesus answered and said unto them, Go and shew John again those things which ye do hear and see: 
Mat 11:5  The blind receive their sight, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the gospel preached to them. 
Mat 11:6  And blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in me.
 
Our Lord Jesus Christ is “THAT PROPHET” predicted to come. Anyone else who claims to be “that prophet” must be a FALSE PROPHET.
 
Jesus Christ plainly warned us not to follow or give heed or to be deceived by false prophets:
 
Mat 24:4  And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 
 
Mat 24:11  And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
 
Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Daily Bible Nuggets | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Islam and Christianity’s views of salvation

Salvation in Islam and Christianity Compared

by Vijay Chandra

Islam and Christianity differ in significant and fundamental ways in their understanding of salvation. Many of these differences can be seen to be in direct contrast to one another. The law of Non-Contradiction states that a thing and its opposite cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense. Thus, theological differences that exist in direct contrast with one another between Islam and Christianity cannot be true in the same sense. This paper will address the fundamental doctrine of both, the doctrine of salvation, or soteriology, using a compare and contrast approach.

 

SAVED FROM WHAT?

The first question to answer concerning soteriology is ‘Saved from what?, What does it mean to be saved, and how did the need for salvation come about?’

 

Christianity teaches that all men [in the gender-neutral sense] have an inherent sin nature. The sin nature is a result of the fall of Adam, the first created being. Genesis 3 records the exchange between the serpent and Eve. God gave Adam and Eve every good thing that He [God] created to eat for their sustenance. They were forbidden only from eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge. But, God thus gave them moral responsibility and choice. They chose to disobey God and thus God’s perfect creation became tainted with the stain of sin, resulting in man being separated [Eph 2:1, 2, 3] from close communion with God that Adam enjoyed prior to the sin. Sin ultimately resulted in both physical and spiritual death—eternal separation from God. This one sin caused all future offspring to be born with sin nature where, left to our inborn instincts [Rom 1:18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 3:23], would live in sin continually. The Bible tells us this one sin condemned all mankind [Rom 5:12].

 

Islam, on the other hand, teaches that Adam did indeed sin, but it was his sin alone and had no bearing on future generations. Sin in no way affected the relationship between man and Allah because no relationship existed. Allah is a far distant god who cannot be known and does not enter into a personal relationship with man as in Christianity. Thus, no relationship was broken. Adam’s sin was his alone, for which Allah was displeased and for which Adam needed personally to seek to reconcile [Sura 4:11 says, “And if anyone earns sin, he earns it against His own soul: for Allah is full of knowledge and wisdom”].

 

Further, in contrast to the Bible, the Qur’an teaches that the fall occurred in heaven, and Adam’s punishment for his sin was banishment to earth for a time to toil for his existence.” [Allah] said: “Get ye down. With enmity between yourselves, On earth will be your dwelling-place. And your means of livelihood, for a time, He said, “Therein shall ye live, and therein shall ye die, but from it shall ye be taken out [at last] ” Sura 7:24-25].

 

SAVED HOW?

Salvation in Christianity is achieved on the basis of faith alone in the atonement of Jesus’ death on the cross [Rom 5:17, 19] and not by any righteous work we may attempt [Eph 2:8, 9]. Works do have a place in the life of a Christian, but only as evidence of a pre-existing faith according to James 2:18. Works or good deeds have no salvific value apart from faith [Titus 3:5, 6, 7].

 

But in Islam salvation is achieved on the basis of good works alone. These works include doing honorable deeds plus keeping five requirements, or ‘pillars’ of Islam: witness [“There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet”], ritual prayers five times daily [salat], almsgiving [zakat], fasting during Ramadan [saum], and a pilgrimage to Mecca [hajj]. On the day of judgment, Allah will have a set of scales to weigh one’s good deeds against his bad deeds [Sura 21:47]. Salvation is achieved by having more ‘good’ deeds on the account than ‘bad’ ones thus hoping to win Allah’s favor.

The Christian’s salvation is sure and confident. God’s promises are never broken, and we can rely on the Bible when it declares that faith in Jesus saves [Acts 16:31] and we can rest confidently in his assurance [1 John 5:13].

By contrast, the Muslim’s salvation is never guaranteed. The individual Muslim must produce good works and hope that at judgment day Allah will grant favor. However, Allah is under no compulsion to save anyone, and no such promise of salvation is found in the Qur’an. Allah saves whom he will and punishes whom he will in what seems to be a purely capricious manner.

 

SALVATION TO WHERE?

Jesus tells us in the Word that he has gone to prepare a place for us, so that where he is we also may be [John 14:2, 3]. Ultimately a new heaven and new earth will be created to replace the earth which was corrupted by Adam’s sin in the garden. The full Father-son relationship will be established as man dwells together with God [Rev 21:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].

 

But salvation for Muslims means gaining entrance into ‘paradise’. In paradise, there is no worship of Allah taking place but virgins will entertain those who go there. Man, [males] are the objects of worship, in that all earthly pleasures are at the disposal of worthy men who gained entrance into paradise. Sura 55 describes Paradise as two gardens, containing all kinds [of trees and delights]. In them [each] will be two Springs flowing [free]; in them will be fruits of every kind, two and two. They will recline on Carpets, whose inner linings will be of rich brocade: the Fruit of the Gardens will be near [and easy of reach]. In them will be Maidens [virgins], chaste, restraining their glances, whom no man or jinn [the devil, or Satan] before them has touched; Like unto Rubies and coral [I wonder from where did Muhammad get this idea of ‘coral’? He lived in the Arabian desert]. And besides these two, there are other two Gardens, Dark-green in color [the Muslims have flags which are green] from plentiful watering. In them [each] will be Two Springs pouring forth water continuous abundance: in them will be Fruits, and dates and pomegranates; in them will be fair [Companions], good, beautiful; Companions restrained [as to their glances], in goodly pavilions; Whom no man or Jinn before them has touched; Reclining on green Cushions and rich carpets no dweller of the ancient Middle East culture could ever dream of: lush, dark green gardens abounding in foliage; abundant rivers of clean, flowing water; every kind of imaginable fresh fruit to tantalize the tongue; virgin maidens awaiting the beck call of each man. This is not a place of holiness, it is a place of excessive indulgence of every pleasure known to man. It is a lustful paradise.

 

WHAT IS HELL?

Those who reject Christ Jesus as the complete sacrifice for their sin, according to the Bible, will be cast into a lake of fire and brimstone, to be tormented eternally. ‘But to the cowards, unbelievers, detestable persons, murderers, the sexually immoral and those who practice magic spells, idol worshippers, and all those who lie, their place will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur’ [Rev 21:8]. Hell is reserved for all who continue to follow earthly pleasures of sin rather than repent of sin and follow Jesus.

 

But according to what the Qur’an teaches, that hell is reserved, not for those who reject the saving grace of Christ, but for those who either

  1. Fail to have enough good deeds to offset their bad deeds on the judgment day.
  2. Or fail to win Allah’s favor and are sent intentionally to hell by Allah’s will.
  3. Regarding the judgment, the Qur’an records: ‘Then shall we question those to whom Our message was sent and those by who we sent it. And verily, We shall recount their whole story with knowledge, for We were never absent [at any time or place]. The balance that day will be true [those whose scale [of good] will be heaven will prosper. Those whose scale will be light, will be their souls in perdition, for that they Wrongfully treated Our Signs’ [Sura 7:6-9]

 

CONCLUSION:

The Islamic doctrine of salvation seems to fall sort of providing an important component of a cohesive and comprehensive worldview. As a father, many of you know what it is like to have a relationship with our sons. If we are made in the likeness of God then it would seem natural that God would want to have a relationship with his adopted sons through Christ Jesus. But Islam does not teach this relationship—Allah does not have any relationship with his faithful ones; he is distant, angry. Allah does not have fellowship even with faithful Muslims who do his bidding. Salvation to paradise seems to be particularly suited to meeting the needs of a specific target group of patrons—Middle Eastern men of antiquity rather than a more broad range of the earth’s population as one would expect of a universal God who loves all people equally. The Islamic doctrine of salvation is man based and Muhammad has experienced this kind paradise which he connected with his own mind and engrafted into the writings. Most the words used in connection with paradise are common words used in his days. Muslim friends, do not be fooled by the false conception of salvation which Qur’an teaches. Salvation is in only through Christ [John 14:6].

Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Doctrinal Discussions, Vijay Chandra Articles | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Quranic Doctrine of the Creation of the World and Man

The Quranic Doctrine of the Creation of World and Man

© Vijay Chandra

Introduction

This article is a Quranic study on the Islamic doctrine of man. I will discuss two issues: the creation of man and the creation of the world.

Is Islam Really Monotheistic?

 

The Qur’an claims that Islam is monotheistic.

“Say: He is Allah, the One! Allah, the eternally Besought of all! He begetteth not nor was begotten. And there is none comparable Unto Him.” (Qur’an 112).

Many modern scholars have cast doubt on the purity of Islam’s monotheism for many reasons.

First, Allah was only one of 360 gods worshipped at the Kabah.

Second, the creed of Islam says that Allah is “the greatest” among the gods.

Third, al Rub is at times distinct from Allah in the Quran.

Fourth, the daughters of Allah are mentioned in the Qur’an. Although the “Satanic verses” were removed from the text, the fact that they were in the original text is revealing.

Fifth, Adam is worshipped by angels and devils.

Sixth, Muslims live in fear of the Jinn and use magical amulets and spells for protection. These spirits are demi-gods.

Seventh, the Black Stone on the wall of the Kabah is clearly worshipped.

Eighth, Muhammad is portrayed by Islam as sinless and is treated as a demi-god.

The Creation Account in the Qur’an

Though the Qur’an offers no systematic account of the creation of the world, references to God as creator and maker of everything abound.

The Muslims claim ‘He is One, the sole creator, Sovereign and Lord.

Say (O Muhammad): Who is the Lord of the heavens and the earth?

Say: Allah … Allah is the Creator of all things, and He is the One, the Almighty … 13:6

He is Allah, other than whom there is no other God … He is Allah, the Creator, the Shaper out of naught, the Fashioner … 59:22–24

Such is Allah, your Lord, the Creator of all things. There is no God save Him … 40:62; cf. 14:32; 3:189

He creates everything through His Word and Will.… Allah createth what He will. Lo! Allah is Able to do all things (24:45). But His command, when He intendeth a thing, is only that He saith unto it: Be! And it is. (36:82)

He created the heavens and the earth in six days (7:54). He created them with truth (64:3), not in vain (3:191), faultlessly (6:73).

The Arabic word for creation is Khalqah’. The following are the allusions to the creation which occur in the Qur’an Surah 1:37.

“Of old we (God) created the heavens and the earth and all that is between them in six days and no weariness touched us.” Surah 11:8;

“Do ye indeed disbelieve in Him who in two days created the earth? Do ye assign Him equals? The Lord of the World is He.”

According to the Traditions (Mish Kat 24:c.i pt3), God created the earth on Saturday, the hills on Sunday, the trees on Monday, all unpleasant things on Tuesday, the light on Wednesday, the beasts on Thursday, and Adam, who was the last of Creation, was created after the time of afternoon prayer on Friday. Hence, today, Muslims have their main prayer on Friday because of the creation of man.

However, the creation account is not according to the Biblical creation, as mentioned in Genesis 1 & 2.

First, the Qur’an contradicts itself as well as the Bible by teaching eight days of creation instead of six. Two plus four plus two equals eight, not six. The question is asked; How many days it take Allah to create the entire world?

Dr. Morey brings out the following issues. When you add up all the days mentioned in Sura 41:9, 10, 12, the Quran says that it took God eight days to create the world (4 days + 2 days + 2days = 8 days), but it took six days (Genesis 1:31). Here again the Quran begins its contradiction of the Bible. However, as Dr. Morey further says that Quran in Suras 7:51 and 10:3, “Surely your Lord is God, who created the heavens and the earth in six days.” If six days is wrong, then eight days is wrong, and hence Sura 41 is wrong.

Using classic Muslim reasoning, they (scholars) respond by saying that the Quran did not say eight days, (then what do we do with Sura 41:9, 10, 12, “Say: What, do you disbelieve in Him who created the earth in two days.”? Verse 10 of Sura 41 says, “So He determined them as seven heavens in two days.…”) Islamic Invasion, pages 137–138 1992, Harvest House Publishing 1992.

The question is asked, Is the Qur’an trustworthy? Is the divine revelation, which Muhammad claims he received it directly from Allah, really divine?

According to Sura 7:156 which says,

“The book was sent down only upon two parties before us, and we have indeed been heedless of their study.”

So the prophet was illiterate. As a merchant, he could probably count and make out letters but he could not read or write fluently.

However, Muhammad contented himself with the belief that his revelations alone were to be the measure of truth. Islam condemns itself with such a claim, calling the truth a lie reveals this religion to be a false one. Jesus called Satan the “father of lies”, (John 8:44).

The Qur’an is a masterwork of Satan, an ingenious mixture of Old and New Testament), of truth and lies that binds all its beliefs in a dangerous imitation of the truth. So, what can we expect from a hallucinating prophet?—A hallucinating Qur’an.

Second, the Biblical account of Creation does not mention specific days but only says that God created all things in six days, (Genesis 2).

Another interesting thing which Mish Kat brings, is that Adam was created on Friday, but this is not according to the Bible because naming of days are not mentioned in the creation account. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let us make man in Our image, according to our likeness; and let them rule.…” (NASB).

Here, in this particular verse, the word ‘Saturday’ is not used, and so, how can the Muslim scholars say this?—They have lied to their fellow Muslims.

In Surah 30:8, it says, “Allah created not the heavens and the earth, and that which is between them, save with truth and for a destined end.…” (Qur’an 30:8).

Allah created the earth and universe through a long systematic process. The Qur’an describes the basic process of the formation of the universe in this way.

“Have not those who disbelieve known that heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them, and We made every living thing of Water?.…” (Qur’an 21:30–31).

These verses of the Qur’an indicate the evolution of the ordered world. The Qur’anic witness further testifies that God created the heavens and the earth and what is between them in six ‘periods’, (not six days as mentioned in Genesis 1 & 2), and no weariness touched Him (Qur’an 50:38). “Lo your Lord is Allah Who created the heavens and the earth in six days.” In my view, the Qur’an contradicts the Bible in regards to the Creation account. The Scripture is very clear that God created all things in six days only and not in long periods as Muslims claim.

If one does not understand the Creation account of the world, then it is very hard for one to understand the Creation account of man. Both go hand in hand. No one can separate the Creation of the World and the Creation account of man from each other. It seems that Muslim scholars have a very vague notion of the creation account.

The Creation of Man

In this section, I will first give a Qur’anic account of the Creation of man, and then proceed to refute it with, and defend, the Biblical account of the Creation of man. My information of the Muslim account of creation will be solely taken from the Qur’an since the Muslims believe that the Qur’an is from Allah.

From scattered passages in the Qur’an, one can deduce something about the Creation of man, after Allah created man out of “potters clay of black mud altered”, He breathed His spirit into him (15:26–29). Some canonical traditions speak of man being created in the image of God. He consists of body and spirit/heart/soul.

The Creation of Adam was, of course, unique. From his rib, his wife was made (39:6). Their descendants, each a Creation of God, are born in a natural way (16:4; 39:6). Both Adam and Eve lived in Paradise prior to the temptation by Satan. The question must be asked; What role has Allah given man as far as his Creation is concerned?

According to the Qur’an, Adam was created as a Khalifa, (vice regent), of God on earth. According to the Holy Qur’an, Allah said to the angels:

“And when thy Lord said unto the angels, ‘Lo! I am about to place a viceroy in the earth’, they said, ‘Will thou place therein one who will do harm therein and shed blood, while we, hymn Thy praise and sanctify Thee?’ He said, ‘Surely know that which ye know not.’ ” (Qur’an 2:30)

According to the Qur’an, another purpose of the Creation of man was: to worship Allah (51:56; cf. 21:19), to be Allah’s servant, and to perform his duty (31:33). Man demonstrates his power and authority on earth by learning from God the names of all Creatures on earth (2:31).

Allah then taught the names of all things and the knowledge of their properties. Although Adam had been taught the names of all things in the presence of angels, they could not recall a single name so they replied, “Be glorified! We have no knowledge saving that which Thou has taught us. Lo! Thou, only, art the Knower, the Wise.” (Qur’an 2:32).

However, Allah had granted man a limited autonomy and finally instructed him to live according to His guidance. As Allah has breathed into man His spirit there is, therefore something in man, which is special, something that man was at least bound to retain in some proportion. That special “thing” is:

a. The intelligence (or knowledge) to discern between right and wrong, good and evil, real and illusory.

b. The will to choose freely between good and bad, true and false, right and evil.

c. The authority to acquire and make use of things around him.

d. The power of speech—to be able to express his worship of his creator.

Some Muslims describe man as the most noble of creation and superior to the angels. Yet man is always subject to the will of God.

“We, even we, created them, and strengthened their frame. And when We will, we can replace them, bringing others like them in their stead.

Lo! This is an Admonishment, that whosever will may choose a way unto the Lord.

Yet, ye will not, unless Allah willeth. Lo! Allah is known, Wise

He maketh whom He will to enter His mercy, and for evil-doers hath prepared a painful doom (76:28–31).

Man’s life on earth is a period of probation (76:2, 3). When he dies he “returns to God” (2:28; 21:35; 32:11) and must account to God for all he has done. Indeed God,

“… hath created life and death that He may try you, which of you is best in conduct.…” (67:2)

For as a responsible creature, he must bear his own burden alone, not that of another man nor can any other bear his burden (17:15; 35:18). On the Day of Judgment Allah will justly judge all mankind and determine their future in either heaven or hell:

“Every soul will taste of death. And ye will be paid on the Day of Resurrection only that which ye have fairly earned.…” (3:185)

A few Quranic verses deserve special attention in any consideration of its teaching about the creation and nature of man.

“Surely We created man of the best statue … (95:4).

So set thy purpose, (O Muhammad) for religion as a man by nature (fitra) upright—the nature (framed) of Allah, in which He hath created man. There is no altering (the laws of) Allah’s creation. That is the right religion, but most men know not.” (30:30)

It is also the Muslim witness that Adam, Allah’s first Khalifa, on earth and the first man in Creation, was also the prophet set for the guidance of mankind.

Since Adam was Allah’s first Khalifa, a prophet, and guide to man, the Angels, (according to Qur’an), are commanded to prostrate themselves before Adam.

“And when We said to the angels: ‘Prostrate yourself before Adam,’ they all prostrated themselves except Satan who in his pride refused and became an unbeliever.” (Surah 2:32)

However, according to Qur’an, the angels are represented generally as God’s messengers; they are like men, His creatures and servants, and worship Him continually. So, if angels are to worship Allah, why would they bow or prostrate themselves before Adam? Also, the angels intercede for man: and they celebrate the praise of their Lord. The question is asked; who is their Lord? Adam or Allah?

Again, the Qur’an is very vague. Iblees, (Satan), the father of the jinn when he (Satan) did not bow, Allah asked, “What hindered you from prostrating thyself?…” the answer Allah received from Iblees (Satan), “I am better than he because thou hast created me of fire and Adam from earth.” According to the Creed of Islam which says “I testify that there is no deity but God.…” Then why would angels prostrate themselves before Adam according to the account of the Creation of man in Genesis. Adam was human, but the Qur’an makes him divine. Adam is deified and Allah is demoted as angels prostrate themselves before Adam.

Prophecy begins with the first man. The first man on earth is given clear guidance and the law to follow, and to pass on to his descendants. This law was, and still is, Islam—submission to Allah.

The first phase of life on earth did not begin the sincere Muslim witness in sin and rebellion against the Creator.

Although Adam and Hauwa were sent from the Heavenly Garden down to earth after Satan’s temptation, they realized their sin and they sought forgiveness from God. They were given the necessary guidance.

Adam was a true Prophet of Allah. They were the first true Muslims. This is clearly revealed in the Qur’an. We now “They said: Our Lord! We have wronged ourselves. If Thou forgive us not and have not mercy on us, surely we are of the lost.” (Qur’an 7:23)

The merciful Allah sent them down to earth with the words,

“And we said: Fall down, one of you a foe unto other! There shall be for you on earth a habitation and provision for a time.” (Qur’an 2:36)

Nevertheless, man’s presence on earth is not a punishment, but rather a test of his commitment to the will of Allah. Although, He sent them to earth after Satan’s temptation, He certainly forgave them.

The Qur’an says,

“Then Adam received from His Lord words (of salvation), and He relented toward him. Lo! He is the Relenting, the Merciful.” (Qur’an 2:3)

Because Allah is all loving and all merciful, in spite of man’s mistakes, Allah assured him guidance. He said,

“Go down, all of you, from hence; but verily there cometh unto you from Me a guidance; and whoso followeth my guidance, there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve.” (Qur’an 2:28)

Therefore, the first man was given both inspiration and guidance for the whole of mankind. Allah assures man that anybody who follows this guidance will be free from any fear for the present or the future and any grief for the past.

Now, since I gleaned from the Qur’an the creation account of the world and man, I will refute it.

Both Islam and Christianity recognize that nature is a wonderful creation of God. Nevertheless, there seems to be some differences also between the Muslim and Christian understanding of nature.

For example, in Islam we have seen that God taught man the name of all things; in the Biblical account we read that man was commanded to name the animals (Genesis 2:20).

In Islam, man is the Khalifa of God on earth; in Christianity, he is commanded to have dominion over the earth. Does this suggest that in the Biblical account, man is given considerable personal freedom, authority, and responsibility to use nature for his own good? However, the Bible does warn that man lives most joyously in his relationships to the nature when he is also living in a right and joyous relationship with God.

The Muslims must understand that the purpose of the Bible is to reveal the meaning of life; it is not a book of scientific information. In the Bible, we read that God commanded man to ‘subdue; fill; till; rule, take care of the earth.’ The Bible nowhere says that Adam was a Prophet, another contradiction.

What is man? That is the question. What does it mean for man to receive the “Spirit of God”? Certainly, it does not mean that man is the highest creation, just as Islam teaches (cf. Hebrews 2:7).

The Christian witness enlarges on the Islamic belief that man received the Spirit of God when he was created (Genesis 2:7, 1:27. Man created in the image of God does not mean that God looks like man or that man looks like God.)

The Islamic scholars have a faulty view of the Bible and they have put their own ideas and reasons into the Scriptures.

The Qur’anic creation account of the world and man is faulty. It should be rejected.

Bibliography

Anberry, A.J: The Koran Translated: New York, Oxford University Press, 1982.

Dawood, N.J: The Koran: Translated with Notes, Middlesex, England, Penguin Books, 1981.

Gibb, H.A.R: Mohammedanism: New York, Oxford University Press, 1982.

Goldziher, I: Introduction to Islamic and Law: New York, Princeton University Press, 1981.

Hughs, T.P: A Dictionary of Islam: London, W.H. Allen & Company, 1885 (Reprinted).

Musk, B: The Unseen Face of Islam: Kent, England, Monarch Publication, 1992.

Masih, Ahd Al: Islam: Villach, Austria, Light of Life Pub., 1981.

Morey, R.A: Islamic Invasion: Las Vegas: Christian Scholars Press, 2005).

Baham, F: Islam and Modernity: Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Raham, F: Islam: Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Rodinson, M: Mohammed: Middlesex, England, Penguin Bks Ltd., 1968.

Stanton, W.V.W: The Teaching of Koran: New York, Bible and Tanners, 1968.

Tisdali, W.St.Clair: Christian Reply to Muslim Objection: Villach, Austria, Light of Life, 1986.

Vijay Chandra

CBUS Doctorate Program

[Posted here at Real Bible Study by permission of the copyright holder, Vijay Chandra. This article appeared in the (2008) Journal of Biblical Apologetics: Volume 11, pp. 125-133.]

Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Vijay Chandra Articles | Tagged , | Leave a comment

DO CHRISTIANS AND HINDUS WORSHIP THE SAME GOD?

by Vijay Chandra 

This question was often put to me as I was serving the Lord in the mission field. I spent forty years working with Muslims, Hindus, Sikh’s and other non-Christian groups, sitting down with Hindu Priests, Muslim Maulana’s and other religious people and even those who practice ‘faith-healings’, or witchcraft. Many Hindus believe that “all rivers go into the sea.” That simply means that there are many ways to achieve eternal life or all gods lead to heaven. Knowing that I came out of Hinduism by the grace of God, I have been delivered from worshipping hundreds of gods. So here I will answer this question for the Hindus who have been entrapped in the worship of many gods, trying to gain salvation.

No, the Hindus and Christians do not worship the same God, because there is no meaningful correlation between the God of the Bible and any of the millions of Hindu gods. Nor can the God of the Bible be identified with Hindu ‘Brahman’, the Ultimate, Divine essence of the universe in Hindu thought and theology. The gods of Hindus have different names and also different core characteristics. Also, the God of the Bible very clearly distinguishes Himself from the many gods of Hinduism. Hindu gods or idols are made of gold, silver, bronze, stone, wood, etc. The God of the Bible cannot be identified with these gods manufactured by man. In Romans 1:18-19, 20, 21, 22-23, 24-25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30-31, 32,  we have an account of the depravity of men. Romans 1:22 says ‘Claiming to be wise, they became fools’. Romans 1:23 says ‘and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things’, Romans 1:24 says ‘therefore, God gave them up in the lust of their hearts to impurity to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves’.

The God of the Bible is not one idol [there is no representation of Him, He is Spirit] and Hindus do not worship the God of the Bible. The God of the Bible is a very specific God and not a Hindu tribal god as Hindus see and think in their imagination.

1. The gods as an expression of God.

The diverse world of Hinduism. Hinduism has millions of finite gods, and apart from these finite gods, Hindus worship snakes, monkeys, cows and even humans (gurus who claim that they are the reincarnation of the other gurus who came before them).

Hindu Idols are decorated and kept throughout the world wherever Hindus are. When compared to the Monotheism of Christianity, it is foolishness to suggest that these two religions have the same object of their worship. Many Hindu theologians and gurus claim that all of those gods are just expressions of one Ultimate god or one true divine essence. Behind the millions of local deities is really just one transcendent Being. And many Hindu thinkers believe that behind all the outward difference, Hindus and Christians really worship the same God.

The one, true God of the Bible continually condemns the worship of any other god or any physical images. He also makes clear that they are different [and false] gods, not merely expressions or even misrepresentations of Himself. In Genesis when Jacob is preparing to make and altar and worship God, he addresses those who would go with him:

“Jacob said to his household and to all who were with him, Put away the foreign gods that are among you and purify yourselves and change your garments. Then let us arise and go up to Bethel, so that I may make there an altar to the God”.

The foreign gods are both distinct from and entirely unacceptable to God. Jacob was not overreacting here. We have many other verses in the Bible which declare this: Exodus 12:12, 20:3, 4, 5, 6, 23:12, 13, 14, Lev 19:4, Num 33:4, Deut 8:19.

And with many other warnings, God makes it clear that he and the other gods are not the same and man is not to create and reverence images. To worship them [idols] is to reject the true God of the Bible. God’s people proclaim:

“Who is like you, O Lord, among the gods? Who is like you, majestic in holiness, awesome in glorious deeds, doing wonders” [Ex 15:11]. Joshua says in Joshua 24:16 “far be it from us that we should forsake the Lord to serve other gods”.

Compare Psalm 135:13-18,

Psalm 135:13  Thy name, O LORD, endureth for ever; and thy memorial, O LORD, throughout all generations.

Psa 135:14  For the LORD will judge his people, and he will repent himself concerning his servants.

Psa 135:15  The idols of the heathen are silver and gold, the work of men’s hands.

Psa 135:16  They have mouths, but they speak not; eyes have they, but they see not;

Psa 135:17  They have ears, but they hear not; neither is there any breath in their mouths.

Psa 135:18  They that make them are like unto them: so is every one that trusteth in them.

There are accounts of people making images for the purpose of worshipping the one True God by name, and this is considered a great sin [Judges 17]. All of this is a mere sampling of what the Bible teaches about this. The Bible is clear that there is one particular God who forbids us to worship man-made images. It is a big business to make money out of carved idols. These man-made gods then are sold to the Hindus. The God of the Bible is not to be conflated with all other gods of the nations, nor is He to be worshipped the way those gods are worshipped. So the Hindu gods cannot be expressions of the God of Bible.

2. The Trimurti and the Trinity

Hindus believe in a Trinity but not in accord with the Biblical thinking. But others will point out that Hinduism expresses its supreme divinity in a triad of gods usually called “Trimurti” which consists of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. They claim that this is simply another cultures’ expression of what Christians call the Trinity, just different names for the same three-fold God. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The Trimurti is a triad of three gods [made with gold or silver, etc. by man]. The Trinity is not in any sense three distinct gods. The Trimurti personify or embody stages in the endless cycle of universal creation and destruction. This concept is not entirely unlike other ancient religions who have two or three gods who embody phases of the fertility cycle of the annual seasons [In the O.T. the god Baal was a fertility god but God condemns Baal and his followers [1 Kings chapters 18 and 19].

So the Hindu trinity has no connection to the biblical truth that one God exists as three coequal, coeternal persons, whose relationships are in no way defined by the functions or cycles of creation. Indeed, Father, Son, and Spirit all shared in creation, they all share in redemption, and they will share in the final judgment of men. The Trinity is not polytheistic personification; it is the reality that the monotheistic God is more personally complex than are His mere human creations.

Hindus believe that behind the expression or manifestation of the three there is one ultimate essence, but that is not what we as Christians think concerning the Trinity. It is not that the Father, the Son, and the Spirit are mere manifestations or differing conceptions of the one. God really does exist as three simultaneous, equal, and eternal persons. This is who and what the one true God really is, and there is no other proper way to conceive of Him. For my Hindu friends, God does not have body parts but in your religion how come your gods have bodies? If they have bodies, why do they have to be carried around by men? They have legs of gold, silver, or wood but they cannot walk; they have eyes which are completely shut; they have hands but the hands cannot be used by the idols. They have mouths but they cannot speak, no blessing comes from them. In sickness, they cannot help you at all because, my Hindu friends, you cannot talk to your gods because their ears are shut.

The Hindu Trimurti all have consorts who are also objects of high worship. These are female goddesses. They have the names ‘kali’ (the destroyer), ‘Latchmi’ (the goddesses of money), and ‘Durga’. Most of them have more than one consort.

 

This is an entirely different idea than what Christians mean by “God” or by the ‘persons of the Trinity’. It also shows that even the concept of ‘three’ in Hindu theology is a bit loose at best. Indeed, in the Smarta Tradition, five gods personify the cycle rather than three. At any rate, even if Hinduism was firmly and strictly committed to the picture of three figures in a set triad, the accident of the number three is hardly a significant parallel.

3. Brahman and the LORD

In much of Hinduism, there is one ultimate reality to which everything else owes its existence. This supreme essence is known as ‘Brahman’. We or someone can say “Sure. The many gods, idols, and spirits worshipped by Hindus are a corruption, and that even the Trimurti cannot possibly be the biblical God, but behind all of that there is just Brahman! Can one not say that Brahman, the Ultimate source and being of reality, is just the Hindu way of expressing the God of Christian Monotheism?”

The answer is No, but the long answer, if we are not careful, can get very long and difficult. Among Hindus, there is no consensus as to who or what Brahman actually is. We can explain, for example, that God is personal while most Hindus believe that Brahman is impersonal. We can state that God is entirely separate and distinct from His creation. The Biblical God does not dwell with the creation, water, cows, stones, wood, earth, moon, sun [these are the created things which Hindus worship or give their reverence with offerings].

But Brahman is the actual essence of all things in the universe and is thus not distinct from creation at all. All things are said to be Brahman, but no created thing is God. The response, however, again will be that some Hindus believe that there is a distinction between Brahman and the universe. Because there is no one, universal definition of what Brahman even is, it can take a very long time to walk through each conflicting definition and show that none of them could be describing the biblical God.

To make it short, we will take a shorter approach. Let us say for the sake of argument, that there are Hindus who believe that Brahman is the personal, transcendent, Almighty, eternal Creator who is distinct from and sovereign over creation. Let’s say for the argument’s sake that they believe that Brahman is perfect, good, the lawgiver and the definer of all morality and will one day judge once and for all the living and the dead. I, being former Hindu, never heard this, but Hinduism is large and diverse. So let’s just suppose that such a Hindu exists. Would that Hindu be talking about the same God as Christians? No, He would not.

An example. Muslims and Christians describe their respective God’s in many very similar terms and even attribute to them many of the same historical acts in the days of men like Noah or Abraham. Still, Muslims and Christians do not worship the same God. How much more then must we say that Hindus, even Hindus that say very similar things about their gods as we say about our God, do not worship the same God that we do.

One final consideration, of course, is the unique and essential quality of the Biblical God of Christianity

The LORD, the great I Am, is Triune in his personal nature. He is Father, Son, Holy Spirit. He is not the Father, brother, sister, etc. He is also not a mere awful unity behind the façade of plurality. He is not an impersonal essence, not simply a singular Person like me and you. Unique above all gods of men, The LORD is personal but also above mere personhood as we experience it. He is not bound by our personal limitations nor does He sink below them into something impersonal.

Among the Hindu gods, there are divisions, strife, cursing, and judgments which different gods create. Hindu gods are not holy at all. They have female wives (goddesses) and each god fights to get his female consorts back from another god who has kidnapped them.

The Hindu religion has no concept of salvation by grace but is bound in reincarnation, etc. Hindus have only one hope to have eternal life and that is through Jesus Christ [he is the way the truth and the life, John 14:6]. Christ is not the reincarnated god Krishna who was only human, a playboy going after the girls who were shepherding their cattle.

 

   

Posted in Apologetics Issues--Other Faiths, Vijay Chandra Articles | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Daily Bible Nugget #471, Isaiah 43:18

The Nugget:

Isa 43:18  Remember ye not the former things, neither consider the things of old. (KJV)

Isa 43:18 Forget what happened long ago! Don’t think about the past. (CEV)

My Comment:

Sometimes dwelling upon the past can bring us down spiritually if what we replay in our memories is more negative than positive. It is always better to think upon the things Paul listed at Philippians 4:8,

Php 4:8 Finally, my friends, keep your minds on whatever is true, pure, right, holy, friendly, and proper. Don’t ever stop thinking about what is truly worthwhile and worthy of praise. (CEV)

Paul had something to say about what is expressed in Isaiah 43:18 above. Paul wrote:

Php 3:13 My friends, I don’t feel that I have already arrived. But I forget what is behind, and I struggle for what is ahead. (CEV) 

Paul explains why he chose to forget what is behind: 

Php 3:14 I run toward the goal, so that I can win the prize of being called to heaven. This is the prize that God offers because of what Christ Jesus has done.

Php 3:15 All of us who are mature should think in this same way. And if any of you think differently, God will make it clear to you. (CEV)

Take time to think about the right things. Take time to read the Bible on a regular basis, even daily if you can. Be careful of dredging up negative things from the past. Paul, in his list of the characteristics of genuine love, tells us that “Love isn’t selfish or quick tempered. It doesn’t keep a record of wrongs that others do” (1 Corinthians 13:5, (CEV, Contemporary English Version).

May you be greatly blessed with much genuine love this season, regardless of what else might be going on!  

 

 

 

Posted in Daily Bible Nuggets, Practical Application Bible Studies, Principles of Christian Living | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment